Fingers in the cookie jar "Love Your Country But Fear ITS government
The position is not one nor the other hand, is not satisfactory and shows the irresistible desire both poles for continued management of the economy. SD wants to retain "family silver", PS sales quickly selected companies due to pressure from Brussels, the SDS as well as a kind of partial divestment. As a reason to sell the media enumerate mainly pressure from Brussels and privatization as a way of obtaining funds to finance the deficit. Despite my personal aversion to Virant, rpx the view only of his party's position of freedom and restraint to the ruling elites. Complete withdrawal of the state from the economy would have two effects: better economic rpx performance of companies and less corruption, and much more free media.
The fact that enterprises owned by the state recruit politically, it's no secret. Management and Supervisory Board are set politically, which are consequently obliged to politicians, they have set forth. How is this debt be repaid? rpx Here are several options, the most famous rpx is the financing of political parties and the employment of family members and acquaintances politicians. This option rpx is not even bad. Much worse is the experience with NLB, where they set the political personnel approve megalomaniac Credits "to beautiful eyes" friends of politicians (Bavčar, Šrot, Kordež), whose losses far krpamo all citizens to capital injections. This set oddolževanje political administrations shows that managers of companies not in the first interestu business success of companies they run, but filling their own pockets and satisfy the wishes of the ruling. The sale of companies to private owners (alien or Slovenians), which would actually take care of the fate of the company, would be reflected in corporate growth rpx and increased employment in the long run. It would also be the "trough" rpx alienated the mass of people into the economy via government enter merely because of their political rpx affiliation.
The media (newspapers, television, etc.). Survive today only and only because of advertising resources. In a country where the state to such an extreme extent embedded in the economy, this means that the funding of the media is largely dependent rpx on state enterprises. If the media report rpx something that the governing politicians do not like it, they will be pressed to set the political board members to threaten media with the withdrawal of funds if they do not cease reporting. Private companies rpx owner of this place in their right mind would not fall, because it harms the financial rpx results of companies. 2) Concerns
Appear to believe that state ownership is not a bad thing, that policy needs to be removed from setting the political staff. I can not find the exact source, but this is (in my mind) uttered an educated person in the economy. This is madness. Why should politicians shun the gold mine and stop adjustable political staff? Why would eliminate rpx financial resources to their clients?
Luksic here in accordance with their ideological orientation course on the frontlines. On this link (http://www.delo.si/novice/varcevalni-ukrepi/sd-bo-o-privatizaciji-podjetij-se-razmislila.html) is to read a statement Luksic
Igor Luksic, who before the meeting reiterated that oppose clearance rpx sale and the fact that "someone came to Slovenia, bought the property, workers went on the road machinery is sold to China." Rather, he says Luksic, agree that it should be search for strategic partners.
This of course fueled by traditional rpx Slovenian afraid to foreign investors, for which we are in crisis. Strategic investor in his opinion someone who comes in Slovenia, donating billions of minority interest and leave the majority ownership in the hands of the state. It was so far our model and because of him no stranger does not come to Slovenia. Still fervently I'm looking for an example in the last 20 years when a stranger came, bought the company, and sold it. And even if it happens to one company, it is nothing compared to the sea of good examples of SiMobil and Lek to the neck, etc.. Of course, the Luksic interest to continue squeezing fingers in the jam and manages recruitment, as it is doing so far.
Perhaps this Slovenians are not known, but the company, even if they are foreign-owned, tax paid in Slovenia, where the company is located in Slovenia. The most successful businesses will pay more money in the form of taxes, as companies pay now. Why would a stranger wanted to buy a company in Slovenia, and then not to invest in it? Where are the rest of the world to pull a profit? Buyer will open jobs where it will be most rewarding, because it's just business logic. If taxes go down and offer a sufficiently educated workforce will continue to be happy opening jobs in Slovenia.
Why? Modern railway line would be built a long time ago, if passed into the ownership of German companies. Luka Koper would not accept the disastrous business decisions rpx for incompetent political staff. It also does not Intereuropa. All these companies to private persons to modernize infrastructure and take smart business decisions.
The position is not one nor the other hand, is not satisfactory and shows the irresistible desire both poles for continued management of the economy. SD wants to retain "family silver", PS sales quickly selected companies due to pressure from Brussels, the SDS as well as a kind of partial divestment. As a reason to sell the media enumerate mainly pressure from Brussels and privatization as a way of obtaining funds to finance the deficit. Despite my personal aversion to Virant, rpx the view only of his party's position of freedom and restraint to the ruling elites. Complete withdrawal of the state from the economy would have two effects: better economic rpx performance of companies and less corruption, and much more free media.
The fact that enterprises owned by the state recruit politically, it's no secret. Management and Supervisory Board are set politically, which are consequently obliged to politicians, they have set forth. How is this debt be repaid? rpx Here are several options, the most famous rpx is the financing of political parties and the employment of family members and acquaintances politicians. This option rpx is not even bad. Much worse is the experience with NLB, where they set the political personnel approve megalomaniac Credits "to beautiful eyes" friends of politicians (Bavčar, Šrot, Kordež), whose losses far krpamo all citizens to capital injections. This set oddolževanje political administrations shows that managers of companies not in the first interestu business success of companies they run, but filling their own pockets and satisfy the wishes of the ruling. The sale of companies to private owners (alien or Slovenians), which would actually take care of the fate of the company, would be reflected in corporate growth rpx and increased employment in the long run. It would also be the "trough" rpx alienated the mass of people into the economy via government enter merely because of their political rpx affiliation.
The media (newspapers, television, etc.). Survive today only and only because of advertising resources. In a country where the state to such an extreme extent embedded in the economy, this means that the funding of the media is largely dependent rpx on state enterprises. If the media report rpx something that the governing politicians do not like it, they will be pressed to set the political board members to threaten media with the withdrawal of funds if they do not cease reporting. Private companies rpx owner of this place in their right mind would not fall, because it harms the financial rpx results of companies. 2) Concerns
Appear to believe that state ownership is not a bad thing, that policy needs to be removed from setting the political staff. I can not find the exact source, but this is (in my mind) uttered an educated person in the economy. This is madness. Why should politicians shun the gold mine and stop adjustable political staff? Why would eliminate rpx financial resources to their clients?
Luksic here in accordance with their ideological orientation course on the frontlines. On this link (http://www.delo.si/novice/varcevalni-ukrepi/sd-bo-o-privatizaciji-podjetij-se-razmislila.html) is to read a statement Luksic
Igor Luksic, who before the meeting reiterated that oppose clearance rpx sale and the fact that "someone came to Slovenia, bought the property, workers went on the road machinery is sold to China." Rather, he says Luksic, agree that it should be search for strategic partners.
This of course fueled by traditional rpx Slovenian afraid to foreign investors, for which we are in crisis. Strategic investor in his opinion someone who comes in Slovenia, donating billions of minority interest and leave the majority ownership in the hands of the state. It was so far our model and because of him no stranger does not come to Slovenia. Still fervently I'm looking for an example in the last 20 years when a stranger came, bought the company, and sold it. And even if it happens to one company, it is nothing compared to the sea of good examples of SiMobil and Lek to the neck, etc.. Of course, the Luksic interest to continue squeezing fingers in the jam and manages recruitment, as it is doing so far.
Perhaps this Slovenians are not known, but the company, even if they are foreign-owned, tax paid in Slovenia, where the company is located in Slovenia. The most successful businesses will pay more money in the form of taxes, as companies pay now. Why would a stranger wanted to buy a company in Slovenia, and then not to invest in it? Where are the rest of the world to pull a profit? Buyer will open jobs where it will be most rewarding, because it's just business logic. If taxes go down and offer a sufficiently educated workforce will continue to be happy opening jobs in Slovenia.
Why? Modern railway line would be built a long time ago, if passed into the ownership of German companies. Luka Koper would not accept the disastrous business decisions rpx for incompetent political staff. It also does not Intereuropa. All these companies to private persons to modernize infrastructure and take smart business decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment