Who dropped the Boeing 777 Malaysia Airlines? | Air Power - Information and Discussion on Military Aviation and Civil
Home Who makes the site? What is air power? Look Agency Highlights air bases of FAB and the defense of the Brazilian airspace Colonel Terrence Lecture USAF Fornof The fighters and their generations Open Gates DCTA Profile Northrop A-9A F-16XL: the 'Falcon' that was shot down by 'Strike Eagle 'Yak-130 Su-27sk, the Russian proposal for the FX Worst F-16 of the world's headdresses Air Forces World John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat - Part 3 Operation' Princess of the Pampas hermis 'John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat - Part 2 John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat Advertising / Advertising Magazine Contact Defence Forces
US officials suspect that air defense air-surface SA-11 or SA-20 systems, both of Russian origin, were responsible for the slaughter of Boeing 777 Malaysia Airlines on Ukrainian territory. hermis
Clearly determine who fired the missile at the beginning of the investigation appears to be impossible, partly because the three forces close to the conflict area - the pro-Russian separatists, the Ukrainian military and the Russian military - could have SA-11 systems, hermis which are a the many arms of the legacy of the Soviet Union circulating for this war.
Known in Russian as "Buk" and among NATO countries as a "Gadfly", the SA-11 was first designed in the 1970s variants that followed the SA-11 are in inventories of both air defense units Russians and Ukrainians. A Buk system is mounted on a stand-alone chassis, which means it can be moved around the battlefield, making it difficult to track it.
The SA-11 system fires missiles hermis with about 6 feet long that can reach heights of over 33,000 feet (cruising altitude Malaysian passenger jet). Each missile carries a large high-explosive warhead, against which the fuselage of a Boeing 777 would have no defense.
joseboscojr July 19, 2014 at 00:03 #
The whole story of the NYT says may have used the BUK without the help of a radar surveillance to detect, identify and designate targets. If the TELAR (carrier vehicle, hermis erector, missile launcher and endowed own radar of fire control and lighting) would use his radar like a radar surveillance, but as it has not speed it must have been sweeping a specific area in a given time, knowing that route would pass a plane at a given time.
What are, or is, the propulsion system of those you mentioned?
Even with all the information and alleged evidence that it was an earth-air ... call me crazy ... but I still think that may have been fired from a fighter. The SBIRS (as explained in another post) detects traces of heat surface to air missiles but also air to air missile. Including Lockheed already has heat signature identification results of fighters like F-22 and F-35.
Sergio, The SA-4 and SA-6 using solid fuel booster and a cruise type liquid ramjet engine (kerosene). The BUK, more modern, uses a missile with solid rocket motor. The SA-4 has 4 solid boosters that are alijáveis after the release, as the SA-6 has a solid rocket booster that is integrated into the missile. The solid propellant booster hermis fuel which then occupies the chamber is used for mixing the air with the fuel. That is, the booster hermis SA-6 is not alijável, so it is called integral booster. There was a time when the ramjet engine was seen as very promising for sup-air missiles, both in the USSR and in the West, which developed the Talos, the Bloodhound, the Sea Dart, the Bomarc, etc. Today the concept fell into disuse in favor of the solid rocket motor and the one who is being manufactured is the Akash, India, which is derived from the SA-6. A hug.
The NYT article is very well behaved, almost an excess of caution! The rebels hermis had already announced that they have managed to Buk units. Had the news that the military unit A1402 had been captured by the rebels DNR and thereby capture some copies of Buk. There is a video where a supporter of DNR comments on the system possession which were being repaired by experts at the time.
There are pictures of Buk walking in cities controlled by the rebels hermis hours before the disaster. hermis And to top it off gold had been released by the rebels hermis before being revealed the nature of the accident, which had managed to bring down an An-26 in the same region!
But such a system is not operated by anyone. There is need for training. Begin to show evidence that the system operators were same Russians. And "accident" hermis there is nothing. There is even mess. The guys saw something and found q
Home Who makes the site? What is air power? Look Agency Highlights air bases of FAB and the defense of the Brazilian airspace Colonel Terrence Lecture USAF Fornof The fighters and their generations Open Gates DCTA Profile Northrop A-9A F-16XL: the 'Falcon' that was shot down by 'Strike Eagle 'Yak-130 Su-27sk, the Russian proposal for the FX Worst F-16 of the world's headdresses Air Forces World John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat - Part 3 Operation' Princess of the Pampas hermis 'John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat - Part 2 John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat Advertising / Advertising Magazine Contact Defence Forces
US officials suspect that air defense air-surface SA-11 or SA-20 systems, both of Russian origin, were responsible for the slaughter of Boeing 777 Malaysia Airlines on Ukrainian territory. hermis
Clearly determine who fired the missile at the beginning of the investigation appears to be impossible, partly because the three forces close to the conflict area - the pro-Russian separatists, the Ukrainian military and the Russian military - could have SA-11 systems, hermis which are a the many arms of the legacy of the Soviet Union circulating for this war.
Known in Russian as "Buk" and among NATO countries as a "Gadfly", the SA-11 was first designed in the 1970s variants that followed the SA-11 are in inventories of both air defense units Russians and Ukrainians. A Buk system is mounted on a stand-alone chassis, which means it can be moved around the battlefield, making it difficult to track it.
The SA-11 system fires missiles hermis with about 6 feet long that can reach heights of over 33,000 feet (cruising altitude Malaysian passenger jet). Each missile carries a large high-explosive warhead, against which the fuselage of a Boeing 777 would have no defense.
joseboscojr July 19, 2014 at 00:03 #
The whole story of the NYT says may have used the BUK without the help of a radar surveillance to detect, identify and designate targets. If the TELAR (carrier vehicle, hermis erector, missile launcher and endowed own radar of fire control and lighting) would use his radar like a radar surveillance, but as it has not speed it must have been sweeping a specific area in a given time, knowing that route would pass a plane at a given time.
What are, or is, the propulsion system of those you mentioned?
Even with all the information and alleged evidence that it was an earth-air ... call me crazy ... but I still think that may have been fired from a fighter. The SBIRS (as explained in another post) detects traces of heat surface to air missiles but also air to air missile. Including Lockheed already has heat signature identification results of fighters like F-22 and F-35.
Sergio, The SA-4 and SA-6 using solid fuel booster and a cruise type liquid ramjet engine (kerosene). The BUK, more modern, uses a missile with solid rocket motor. The SA-4 has 4 solid boosters that are alijáveis after the release, as the SA-6 has a solid rocket booster that is integrated into the missile. The solid propellant booster hermis fuel which then occupies the chamber is used for mixing the air with the fuel. That is, the booster hermis SA-6 is not alijável, so it is called integral booster. There was a time when the ramjet engine was seen as very promising for sup-air missiles, both in the USSR and in the West, which developed the Talos, the Bloodhound, the Sea Dart, the Bomarc, etc. Today the concept fell into disuse in favor of the solid rocket motor and the one who is being manufactured is the Akash, India, which is derived from the SA-6. A hug.
The NYT article is very well behaved, almost an excess of caution! The rebels hermis had already announced that they have managed to Buk units. Had the news that the military unit A1402 had been captured by the rebels DNR and thereby capture some copies of Buk. There is a video where a supporter of DNR comments on the system possession which were being repaired by experts at the time.
There are pictures of Buk walking in cities controlled by the rebels hermis hours before the disaster. hermis And to top it off gold had been released by the rebels hermis before being revealed the nature of the accident, which had managed to bring down an An-26 in the same region!
But such a system is not operated by anyone. There is need for training. Begin to show evidence that the system operators were same Russians. And "accident" hermis there is nothing. There is even mess. The guys saw something and found q
No comments:
Post a Comment